Total number of fires detected : 1
[ONLY TOP 5 RESULTS ARE SHOWN.]
Note that a media report states that battery charging was completed on 11th August 2013. Is this hotspot indicative of some problem in the battery compartment?
As the huge dam surge of some 1049 Everest Mountain heights of water pressure head change at the center of Gravity of the World's dams hit the Naval Dockyard, all hell broke loose on the Sindhurakshak, the application of the Precautionary Principle makes us say. It struck the sub when the dam surge was passing from the damquake at Canary Isles to the damquake in the Aegean Sea. Imagine the unthinkable if it were a nuke sub., and that in the Capital City MUMBAI.Battery runaway may have been a consequence of this leading to the explosion(See below however). Of course by a nuclear effect the ammo and the ship might have exploded.
See by google search The Nuclear Effect in Causing Earthquakes/Ramaswami Ashok Kumar for the phenomenon. See also
But this is the question of lead acid batteries. So thermal runaway may not have been caused. Hydrogen leak and explosion may have been at play. The angle of sabotage of course is being suggested to be studied.
Bring back the forests ecologically by cooperative efforts by communities and dismantle the dams and centralized methods of meeting specialized needs. Forests prevent climate change and quakes and extremes of rain that dams spawn. The great American Flu Pandemic was caused by dams. See http://stopflowcatchflu.blogspot.com .
Belief in the truth of a law increases in direct proportion to the number of successful occurrences of the law.
The ballpark estimate of the Dam Content Change surge is 890 BCM due to the World’s dams and this at the center of gravity of the water masses behind the dams applied at the Sindhurakshak berth's foundation a water moment equivalent to a great earthquake of magnitude 8.9.The heat might have been rapidly conducted up the sub to cause fire in the battery compartment. This resulted in the death of a sailor and injuries to two others.
The Kursk and the Sindhurakshak both are of the same vintage(1997). Thus were the torpedoes HTP type?
In both there were two explosions. Was the second explosion in Sindhurakshak after the same time period after the first(135 seconds)? Of course Kursk is a nuke. But HTP type torpedos may be a common factor.
The INS Sindhuratna accident(?) and battery compartmant fire and smoke.26 February 2014.
Two officers were found dead.
Yes there were a number of earthquakes between 0030 hrs and 0130 hrs when the tragedy occurred.
The surge waves of the dams struck the submarine five times.
See Table below(Right click on the table to view it in a separate tab):
The Latest Accident: INS Kolkata CO2 Gas Cylinder Burst: 7 Mar 2014 at 715 hrs UTC
One Naval officer killed and two others hospitalised.
The sudden pressure blast may have been triggered by the dams, by the application of the precautionary principle. This may have occurred as the surge wave was traveling from the earthquake at Mexico to the earthquake at Calrsberg Ridge. See the following table.
Not that the time difference between the arrival of the surge at Mumbai Port Trust and reported time of the blast is only 4.25 %.